Showing posts with label URGN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label URGN. Show all posts

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Cooper, Westcott and Lansbury (2003)


from Cornfield and McCammon 2003

  • Australia
    • states enacting neoliberal economic policies, rolling back some of the legislative protections unions had historically enjoyed (188-190)
    • the results has been more confrontation between employers and unions (190)
      • the response is greater organizing

Cornfield and McCammon 2003



Introduction from their edited volume

  • they use a union-centered approach that places labor organizations and their actions as the center of a web of constraining and facilitating social reactions (2)
  • but they also see three important social relations in revitalization, between unions and 1) workers, 2) employers, and 3) the state (3)
  • "the state influences the the amount of political opportunity for the expression of labor actions." (11)
  • sees labor as attempting to regain its autonomy from the state in certain parts of the GS (like venezuela and Mexico) (14-16)
    • but these are all labor movements themselves pushing away from the state, not teh state pushing labor unions out

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Molina Romo 2005

Molina Romo, Óscar. (2005) "Political Exchange and Bargaining Reform in Italy and Spain." European Journal of Industrial Relations 11(1): 7–26.
  • In the conclusion
  • labor reforms in Italy and Spain were crafted by policy concertation between employers, unions, and the government took an active role (sometimes even by forcing reforms) (20)
    • but the intervention of the government gave the trade unions political leverage, and allowed for political exchange, to improve the outcomes of reforms (20-21)
    • this is a little different, as the government taking an active role in this reform resulted in the government opening itself to feeling the wrath of unions
    • earlier reforms in the 1980s had left unions with weakened industrial power but continued political power, this they were able to leverage into protecting their bargaining structures in the 1990s (22)
    • THE POINT, here, is that
      • the government didn't take a very active role, but did so in careful negotiations with unions and employers, and
      • in this case, when faced by a political challenge from unions, the government gave in to demands (22)