- Intro
- Teachers have been the most militant sector since 1989 (77)
- increase in militancy is related to, but can't be fully explained by (78)
- worsening of conditions
- challenges to income security (through decentralization)
- "Patterns of teachers' militancy are better explained by political alignments between public employees' and teachers' unions than by labor institutions (78)
- How does/would this explanation change in the context of no viable parties outside the PJ?
- then partisan alignments are less salient, but alignments with factions of the one party may be important
- at some point this may become clientelism, depending on your definition of clientelism, as unions may ally themselves with personalties or groups within the PJ (as they have in the past)
- Teachers' strikes reflect a larger but uneven trend of provincialization of protests, which happened no doubt because of the decentralization of the education system
- Explaining Public Teachers' Strikes
- economic conditions don't quite play in here, since these are public sector workers (79)
- labor strength can var across provinces, so it could bean important variable
- but political alignments will likely be very salient, given that governors have a high degree of discretion in implementing labor laws (80)
- Argentine Public Education and the Provincial Analysis
- by 1993 primary and secondary public education administered at the provincial level (81)
- provincial governors now have the power to decide legality of strikes, etc, but also have a lot of discretionon how they use labor laws
- provincial governors also control education expenditures
- CTERA has traditionally been the national union (82)
- teachers caught between government and parents at times
- A Cross-Provincial Test on Teachers' Militancy
- dependent variable: strike days lost
- independent measures: (82-83)
- political affiliation of union leaders compared to governor, percentage of legislators of governor's party, change in teachers' real earnings, unemployment, attendance bonus, unionization, union fragmentation
- downside: data are for a short period of time, so some independent variables don't really change much (85)
- Political alignment (of union leaders/governors) has the strongest effect, though other variables have an effect as well (86)
- if job stable and unemployment high (ie low exit alternatives), union members will protest for better things
- authors suspect that executive discretion diminishes the effect of institutional and organizational variables, which is why they weren't necessarily strong effects here (88)
- Conclusion
- politicization of labor relations thanks to provincialization of education AND executive discretion re: labor laws
- suggestion: labor laws should be strengthened to decrease executive discretion, which should in turn decrease strike days (89)
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Murillo and Ronconi 2004
Murillo, Maria Victoria, and Lucas Ronconi. 2004. "Teachers' Strikes in
Argentina: Partisan Alignments and Public-sector Labor Relations". Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID). 39 (1): 77-98.
Labels:
Argentina,
labor unions,
protest,
teachers,
union power
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment