- Social cohesion comes when a country has achieved economic progress and redistributed the fruits of that growth to the whole of society (81)
- social cohesion helps ensure fairer development and involve all the population in efforts to achieve that growth
- social protection is still limited in LA
- social cohesion provides the causal link between mechanisms of integration and well-being and individuals feeling of belonging to society (82)
- this articles measures this by looking at labor marker participation, social protection and public perception of the effectiveness of instruments about these two issues
- Open markets and their effect
- open markets have meant employment is more closely linked to external demand
- this means the possibilities for increasing wages above productivity or expanding internal demand is limited
- instability is high and particularly affects smaller countries with more open economies, which in turn usually have inadequate instruments to deal with this instability
- informality and precariousness grew. even when poverty retreated, high-income groups shifted some of the adjustment costs to the middle-income groups. Thus, inequality did not diminish and wide income disparities grew (83)
- Employment tenure
- decline in employment tenure and high labor turnover
- but the time spent unemployed tended to be shorter
- but people worried about being unemployed: 75% worried about it, while only 59% of households experienced some unemployment during the previsous year (citing Latinobarometer from 2005)
- only 18% felt protected by labor legislation
- the informal economy
- insecurity affects the whole population, but it tends to affect the socially excluded even more (84)
- informal sector became the informal economy
- precarious work was mostly concentrated in the informal sector, but was increasingly seen in formal-sector enterprises (85)
- only Chile, Argentina, Brazil and El Salvador have seen a decrease in informal-sector activities in the past 15 years (no citation for this, seems to get it from ECLAC) (86)
- the larger the informal sector, the larger public perception of insecurity...more unequal countries also have a larger informal sector (87)
- labor market participation determines eligibility for social security which determines cohesion, and obviously informal sector workers don't participate in labor market (89)
- Strategies favoring social cohesion
- workers in informal sector are often workers and entrepreneurs (92)
- they are socially excluded by low incomes, lack of social protections, and employment isntability
- they are integrated into the labor market but on a precarious basis
- need to extend social protections in order to make people feel like they belong (92-93)
- entry into the formal sector opens the door to social and economic citizenship which, in turn, is a prerequisite for belonging and integration (93)
- issues of micro-enterprises being able to absorb the costs associated with formal employment (95)
- perhaps create a dual system, one for small biz and one for big ones
- "fundamental rights are inalienable even if the necessary compliance involves some job losses" (96)
- Three strategies to address social tension (105)
- incorporate the informal sector into the modern sector
- fix problems with "disguised" employment and/or emloyment not initially included under labor legislation (105-106)
- do flexicurity (106)
Saturday, June 14, 2014
Tokman 2007
Tokman, Víctor E. 2007. "The informal economy, insecurity and social cohesion in Latin America". International Labour Review. 146 (1-2): 81-107.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment