Saturday, June 14, 2014

Tokman 2007

Tokman, Víctor E. 2007. "The informal economy, insecurity and social cohesion in Latin America". International Labour Review. 146 (1-2): 81-107.

  •  Social cohesion comes when a country has achieved economic progress and redistributed the fruits of that growth to the whole of society (81)
    • social cohesion helps ensure fairer development and involve all the population in efforts to achieve that growth
    • social protection is still limited in LA
    • social cohesion provides the causal link between mechanisms of integration and well-being and individuals feeling of belonging to society (82)
      • this articles measures this by looking at labor marker participation, social protection and public perception of the effectiveness of instruments about these two issues
  • Open markets and their effect
    • open markets have meant employment is more closely linked to external demand
      • this means the possibilities for increasing wages above productivity or expanding internal demand is limited
    • instability is high and particularly affects smaller countries with more open economies, which in turn usually have inadequate instruments to deal with this instability
    • informality and precariousness grew. even when poverty retreated, high-income groups shifted some of the adjustment costs to the middle-income groups. Thus, inequality did not diminish and wide income disparities grew (83)
  • Employment tenure
    • decline in employment tenure and high labor turnover
    • but the time spent unemployed tended to be shorter
      • but people worried about being unemployed: 75% worried about it, while only 59% of households experienced some unemployment  during the previsous year (citing Latinobarometer from 2005)
      • only 18% felt protected by labor legislation
  • the informal economy
    • insecurity affects the whole population, but it tends to affect the socially excluded even more (84)
    • informal sector became the informal economy
      • precarious work was mostly concentrated in the informal sector, but was increasingly seen in formal-sector enterprises (85)
      • only Chile, Argentina, Brazil and El Salvador have seen a decrease in informal-sector activities in the past 15 years (no citation for this, seems to get it from ECLAC) (86)
      • the larger the informal sector, the larger public perception of insecurity...more unequal countries also have a larger informal sector (87)
    • labor market participation determines eligibility for social security which determines cohesion, and obviously informal sector workers don't participate in labor market (89)
  • Strategies favoring social cohesion
    • workers in informal sector are often workers and entrepreneurs (92)
      • they are socially excluded by low incomes, lack of social protections, and employment isntability
      • they are integrated into the labor market but on a precarious basis
    • need to extend social protections in order to make people feel like they belong (92-93)
      • entry into the formal sector opens the door to social and economic citizenship which, in turn, is a prerequisite for belonging and integration (93)
    • issues of micro-enterprises being able to absorb the costs associated with formal employment (95)
      • perhaps create a dual system, one for small biz and one for big ones
    • "fundamental rights are inalienable even if the necessary compliance involves some job losses" (96)
  • Three strategies to address social tension (105)
    • incorporate the informal sector into the modern sector
    • fix problems with "disguised" employment and/or emloyment not initially included under labor legislation (105-106)
    • do flexicurity (106)
my take: this dude is from Europe, and wants the rest of the world to look like Europe

No comments:

Post a Comment