Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Carnes 2014




    • Theory (chapter 1)
      • questions on differences between labor codes and stability of labor codes are interrelated (20)
      • Argument(s)
        • higher skill levels lead to, in the long term, more protective and generous laws governing individual employment relations
        • greater organizational potential relates to, in the short to medium term, political action and better collective laws
        • short term disruptions are fragile, likely forced by undemocratic governments or bait and switch
        • overall, economic constraints (skills) are the foundation of laws, and political action (unions) can change them in the medium term (21)
      • typology of labor regimes: variation in indivdual and collective law (27-29)
        • Corporatist =individual high + collective high = mex and arg
        • Encompassing = individual low + collective high = peru
        • Professional - individual high + collective low = chi and uru
        • Market = no regulation
      • Labor policies that last and achieve consensus do so because their provisions are consonant with the prevailing economic order (32)
      • "skill distributions are entrenched in local economic institutions, and as a result tend to be very slow to change." (33)
        • relative ratio of high to low skill workers will affect labor law (35)
        • lots of high skill workers = individual protections, job stability
        • lots of low skill workers = high employment favored over protections
      • strong labor movement improves hand of workers demanding labor legislation (36-40)
      • earlier laws, political history, international institutions, and national political regimes also affect labor law promulgation (40-42)
      • same typology as above, except repalce indiv protxns with "skill endowment" and collective protxns with "union/organizational strength" (42-44)
      • also, even though regime may change, labor law may create feedback loop to constrain transformations in skill endowment, legislation: meaning corporatism begets groups that are good at corporatism, etc. (path dependence) (43-46)
    • chapters 2 and 3 code, quant analyze labor codes...looks pretty cool.

No comments:

Post a Comment