Collier 1992
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1992. The contradictory alliance:
state-labor relations and regime change in Mexico. [Berkeley]:
International and Area Studies, University of California at Berkeley.Overview:
- Nice play-by-play of electoral maneuverings that created the
party/union alliance
- President has reins over party/union “alliance”
- Party union links were a vehicle of political control,
president could impose labor leaders and, thus, manipulate unions
- Unions In party could only influence policy, not make it.
- Government also transmitted to unions what CB demands if
would support (at firm level)
- Party/union links allow for dispensing resources and favors
- Party union links were a vehicle of political control,
president could impose labor leaders and, thus, manipulate unions
- Party/union alliance afforded the party legitimacy
(elections, ‘cares about working class’)
“From the point of view of the state, control over labor, social peace, and class harmony were desirable. Yet an overtly anti-labor policy was antithetical to the nature of the regime.” (50)
“The union leadership was also torn in two directions…cooperation with the state was attractive not only as a channel of personal advancement, but also as a way for union leaders to seek institutional access and gain influence an concessions. At the same time, precisely the opposite relationship—autonomy from the stat—could be a source of union power and bargaining strength vis-à-vis the state.” (50)
No comments:
Post a Comment