Samstad 2002
Samstad, James G. 2002. "Corporatism and Democratic
Transition: State and Labor during the Salinas and Zedillo
Administrations". Latin American Politics and Society. 44
(4): 1-28.Overview:
- Corporatism involved three levels
- State/”Macro”-corporatism: national level, tripartite
discussions of economic and political policy (3)
- Micro/Local or firm level corporatism: representatives on
JCA’s
- Party corporatism
- State/”Macro”-corporatism: national level, tripartite
discussions of economic and political policy (3)
- Shift to export-led growth created tensions in the coalition
forged under ISI (5)
- Procedural democracy poses a greater challenge to corporatism
that ELG (6)
- Decline of strong president gives each level of corp. more
autonomy
- Resistance to herding rank and file by authoritarian labor
leaders
- Decline of strong president gives each level of corp. more
autonomy
- By end of Salinas, labor corp. still basically intact (11)
- Creation of UNT in 1997, labor split challenged all three
levels of corporatism
- who gets to peak bargain? (MACRO)
- CTM tries ‘corporatism without government’
- CTM tries ‘corporatism without government’
- UNT and some in CT call for more democratic PRI(PARTY)
- ALSO: primaries for candidates decreases labor delegates
- ALSO: primaries for candidates decreases labor delegates
- who gets to peak bargain? (MACRO)
- Few structural changes to corporatism, HOWEEVER, big changes
in how corporatism works in practice
“The party (PRI) has formally incorporated labor as a ‘sector’ with nominal voting rights…Over the years, representatives of PRI-affiliated labor organizations consequently secured a non-insignificant share of nominations for elected posts…In return, those organizations were often expected to deliver the votes and organizational support of their rank and file…” (4)
“The shift to export-led growth created tensions in the coalition forged under ISI” (5)
“What change that has occurred has been in how corporatism functioned in practice, and this transformation has come primarily as a side-effect of a decline in centralized presidentialism and an increase in political pluralism during [Zedillo’s] sexennio.” (19)
No comments:
Post a Comment