Grayson
2004
(in Wiarda 2004)
Grayson, George W. “Mexico's Semicorporatist Regime,” in
Wiarda, Howard J. 2004. Authoritarianism and corporatism in Latin
America--revisited. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Overview:
- Salinas’s neoliberal reforms
- Ruptured the ruling party (246)
- Diminished rewards to the faithful (due to lower government
revenues through tariffs, quotas, etc.)
- Diminished central control
- Caused businesses to start competing on labor costs, which
is bad for system/unions
- Ruptured the ruling party (246)
- Wiarda also Suggests these reforms led to calls for greater
democracy, and gave rise to opposition party successes (especially
at the state and local level)
- Population growth and social diversification also meant there
were more groups outside the corporatist political framework (247)
- As corporatist institutions had been slightly undermined, Fox
did not have great control over corrupt labor leaders (248)
- Talks a lot about Fox’s political styling
- disdain for politicians
- attempt to use media instead of government organizations
- included PRI in some things, didn’t hammer away at them,
not many panistas in his cabinet
- allowed Sup Marcos and EZLN to address nation
- disdain for politicians
- PRI maintains traditional sectors, though does some changes
(BUT, of course, primaries for elections undermine any
delegate/candidate concessions)
- AMLO taking some corporatist reins, very humanistic but also
relatively authoritarian (read: populist)
- Lots of foreign NGOs hanging out, too…massive increase over
the 2000s, maybe they’ll be important in the future?
- No new rules of the game exist for governing (255)
- No new organizations have replaced traditional corporatist
structures
- Corp. structures remain, although in much weaker form.
- No new organizations have replaced traditional corporatist
structures
Quotes:
“No new rules of the game exist for governing.” (255)
No comments:
Post a Comment